A few weeks ago we discussed some striking
trends in media consumption. Specifically, we noted that Millennials age 14 to
25 now turn to social media as their primary
source of news at a rate that will soon eclipse television, perhaps by the time
you read this blog. We’ve also seen that Americans are trending toward using
mobile devices exclusively for online access, and that some homes don’t have
desktop or laptop computers at all anymore. Naturally, these trends are being
driven by young people who have time and again proven to be the innovators and
opinion leaders of the technological revolution in American society.
In this country, young people have almost
always been the drivers of technological innovation. Alexander Graham Bell was
29 years old when he and Thomas Watson made the first telephone call (source: http://www.biography.com/people/alexander-graham-bell-9205497#passion-for-shaping-the-future).
Philo T. Farnsworth demonstrated his “electrical image” device, which we now
know as television, when he was 21 (source: http://www.farnovision.com/chronicles/tfc-who_invented_what.html).
And, of course, there’s Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, two of America’s most
prolific college dropouts. Gates was 20 years old when he founded Microsoft
(source: http://www.biography.com/people/bill-gates-9307520#early-life)
and Jobs was 21 when he and Steve Wozniak started Apple (source: http://www.biography.com/people/steve-jobs-9354805#early-life).
The list of young innovators grows with each passing year. Our young people are
the big thinkers, the minds that have the capacity to grab hold of the future
and pull it into the present.
This unbridled ability to think without limits
has also created problems and issues worth considering. Now that the world has
been blessed with the inventions of computers, mobile devices and the Internet,
we have become the keepers of this technological power. We work to keep these
technologies safe yet ensure that they can be used to the fullest ability. We
struggle with conversations over how much influence any one person or group
should have over its use and contents (source: https://www.fcc.gov/general/open-internet).
We regulate it just enough to create some sense that our most vulnerable
citizens — our children — will not be harmed in its use (source: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act).
In many ways, we are still in the “Wild West” era
when it comes to Internet safety and digital citizenship. This unfortunately
means that children are at an elevated risk of exposure to cyber threats and
obscene content when interacting with technology and a free and open Internet. The
fine line between Americans’ First Amendment rights and the rights of all
children to be protected from harm continues to create heated and fluid
conversations within private organizations, all levels of government, and
individual homes.
This is a conversation that is happening the
most in our schools. As a communicator for a public school system, I hear
discussions happening continually on the issue of technology, our deployment of
it, and how we should use it responsibly. The interesting thing about this
conversation point is that it affects everyone
in a school. All of us are charged with the responsibility of being good
stewards of the resources that have been given to us. This means that we must
give the best knowledge and information we have to our children so that they
can learn it, analyze it, and synthesize new information on their own. But, we
also have a responsibility to create a digital fence around our children so
that they can explore and learn without fear of anyone compromising their
experience or their safety.
The benefits of technology in the classroom are
becoming clearer. As students are encouraged to use devices at school or even
bring their own from home, teachers and administrators must simultaneously
curate the best educational tools available through the Web. These technologies
create opportunities to engage students who might not otherwise benefit from
more “traditional” teaching methods that, frankly, were designed with greater
concern of uniform approaches than individual minds.
At the same time, however, there must be
layers of vetting and researching the apps and websites that we use in the
learning process, then there must be additional layers in place to ensure that
these apps align with responsible safety and security policies. The Consortium
for School Networking (CoSN) has stated that “no one is exempt from the threat
of cyber attacks,” and parents deserve “assurances that student data are
protected” (source: http://www.cosn.org/about/news/national-education-organizations-launch-effort-build-%E2%80%98trusted-learning-environment%E2%80%99-us-1).
Education advocacy groups like the National Education Association thus
emphasize digital citizenship and the need for educators to build “responsible
use” policies for students as well as teachers (source: http://neatoday.org/2012/07/19/should-schools-embrace-bring-your-own-device/).
For any of this to actually benefit children,
however, there must be a desire to bridge the “digital divide.” Technology is a
means of information sharing, and it is ultimately up to the student to decide
what to do with that information once it has been given. But, it is unjust to
limit the ability for any child to gain access to the information that comes by
way of technology. There is a growing concern that an overreliance on
technology at schools may breed a new social stigma among children where
instead of “being teased for clothing choices, now, perhaps it is because the
child cannot afford the next-gen iPad” (source: http://www.zdnet.com/article/bring-your-own-device-scheme-launches-at-school/).
I think that we will bridge that divide in
time as technology costs become lower and lower, and we should encourage
innovation projects that seek to bridge the digital divide. A great example of
this is seen in the rural town of Piedmont, Alabama, where the school district in
2009 established a program that gave a laptop and free home internet access to
every child in grades 4-12. Since the program’s implementation, the number of students
taking college entrance tests has more than doubled. Their test scores are now
above the state average. Enrollment in the school district has jumped 20
percent. Apple even recognized Piedmont’s high school as the only Apple
Distinguished School in America (source: http://www.digitalpromise.org/districts/piedmont-city-school-district).
This is the promise that comes from harnessing
the power of technology in a meaningful way for our young people. When we
remove the limits to access and simultaneously encourage responsible use of
technology, the innovators of tomorrow are more prepared to create the “next
big thing” that inspires us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment